The fact that so few people actually have their own opinions
about world issues (or at the very least do not openly share them), but instead
conform to media inspired beliefs is something rather concerning. We need a revolution, yet this won’t happen
unless everyone realises the ideological control of the media and societal
institutions in biasing our perception of the world. So many people do not care nor have opinions
about things that really matter, such as the state of humanity, the way we so
easily obey the people at the top of hierarchy because we believe they’re
better than us, or the way the environment is used for capitalistic gain.
Before David Cameron rearranged members of The Cabinet,
Michael Gove announced he was planning on changing the National Curriculum at
GCSE level to only teach British literature, and it would appear that Nicky
Morgan is willing to carry out this scheme.
We do not need more British / English literature, we need more good
literature, more substantial written works that motivate students. This announcement was largely revolted
against by a proportion of the British population, yet government has not
listened. Gove (and now Morgan) see the
centralisation of power over literature as another step towards promoting the
whole “keep Britain British”
keepsake. Gove's syllabus changes mean
that classic US books will be removed from the GCSE syllabus and the focus will
be on pre-20th century writers from England.
It is another meagre attempt to suggest that English is an ethnicity,
rather than a language. This approach is
very similar to the Stalinisation of Russia which only allowed Russian pro-government
literature. Who really cares where the literature
studied for examinations comes from, when at the end of the day, all that
matters is that students can identify with the texts and are inspired by the
themes and characters?
If more than 80,000 people were able to sign a petition in
response to this announcement and were willing to attempt to revolutionise the
way Gove viewed and controlled schools and pupils, then why have they not been
willing to disobey and defy more outrageous governmental economic policies?
In July 2014 the government gave the hydraulic fracturing (fracking)
drive the go-ahead. Ministers admitted
that they were authorising the expansion of fracking across Britain that would
allow drilling in national parks and other protected areas in “exceptional circumstances”. Roughly half the country will be advertised
for exploration by onshore oil and gas companies seeking to expand their
profitability. However, mainstream media
channels controlled by the capitalist state did not discuss this. This is another example of how the general
public has been influenced by societal institutions and their expanse of
ideological power and control. The “positives” of fracking were highlighted
and emphasised:
- Shale gas will help tackle climate change
- Fracking wells will be almost unnoticeable
- UK shale gas will lower bills
Conversely, these are all myths peddled by large
corporations and governmental agencies in order to win over the approval of the
public. The truth of the situation is
shocking:
- The carbon footprint for shale gas is up to 100 times greater than wind and tidal energy (both offshore wind and tidal energy emit between 5-13g of carbon dioxide/kWh, whilst shale gas produces 423-535g)
- In order to match North Sea gas production, up to 20,000 fracking wells will be needed
- Bill savings will be tiny (approximately £19 a year for a medium sized house, compared to £125 saved a year on a house after solar panels are installed)
But where were the people fighting this atrocity? There were the Greenpeace activists and the
environmentalists, but no major outcry from the general population. Where was the revolutionary spirit that we
have, and has been seen in response to educational changes?
We know that people care, so why do they not act? People only engage when it is affecting them
directly, rather than acting on behalf of their fellow neighbours and
peers. This hypocrisy of society is affecting
everything and everyone.
We need people who are open-minded yet can hold their values
in the face of adversity; rational yet radical; free-spirited yet efficient.
The British government claims it wants to listen to its
people. When its people speak up in
response to proposals and changes, they are shut down and dismissed. Yet they question why we are so afraid to
stand up to those at the top of society and express our discontentment with the
way we’re told to act? Do we honestly
believe that these people are better than us?
That they are worth more than the people they claim to work for? They are no better than us. They simply have more money, and consequently
more power, which has reinforced their capitalistic mind-set of greed, avarice
and hostility. The difference between
them and us is that we know the truth.
We know how difficult life can be without the support of an old-boys’
network. We know what it is like to be
on the breadline. We are forced to
succumb to and accept the spurious choices a government we elected to serve us
because we were fooled into the illusion of choice. And what a great job they’re doing at ruining
us as a nation. We have lost so much,
but they have gained at our expense. Is
this the society we want to live in?
We don’t live in a democracy. We are heading towards a totalitarian
state. How does it happen that the
majority of good citizens with good intentions end up as participants in an
inhumane power structure that is leading the country toward a kind of
totalitarianism? The greatest impediment
to true democracy in the West is not socialism and revolution, but the
corporate world.
We need a revolution.
Not only because we don’t have enough jobs, not solely because the
public health system is no longer functional and is being sold off and privatised.
Not just because our political system and politicians are corrupt or because our
teachers are not being paid their worth.
Not only because we have put the needs of the few over the needs of the
many, nor because we have exploited the environment at the cost of our health
and community. We need a revolution
because the current system is not working, it is not a system where people can
live the way they are meant to live; because even those who are on the favoured
side of the corporate machine are not able to find true fulfilment, happiness
and contentment - this is not a system created by the people nor for them, but it
is a system created by the untamed machine that operates on the power of money and
greed alone.
We need a revolution.
No comments:
Post a Comment